<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;revelation without revolution&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaeljfaris.com/blog/2009/07/revelation-without-revolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaeljfaris.com/blog/2009/07/revelation-without-revolution/</link>
	<description>rhetorics, compositions, technologies, literacies, sexualities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:05:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://michaeljfaris.com/blog/2009/07/revelation-without-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-21098</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaeljfaris.com/blog/?p=1397#comment-21098</guid>
		<description>Hi Joseph,

The slacker characterization was my own (mis)characterization, related to my disavowal of the label because I didn&#039;t identify that way. This isn&#039;t a characterization that Brabazon really draws on. I think any characterization of a generation is going to be a mischaracterization, because of differences in class, race, and location experiences.

I don&#039;t see that many differences between your characterization of Gen-X hip hop and Brabazon&#039;s characterization. When she says Gen X literacy is about revelation, she is arguing that revelation is the &quot;building of critical consciousness&quot; (71), something that I think hip hop did quite well. I think, and I might be mischaracterizering Brabazon&#039;s work here, that she&#039;s also making a distinction between popular culture and more collective, local culture and memory work engaged by those on marginalized by society—the latter of which I&#039;d characterize earlier hip hop as.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joseph,</p>
<p>The slacker characterization was my own (mis)characterization, related to my disavowal of the label because I didn&#8217;t identify that way. This isn&#8217;t a characterization that Brabazon really draws on. I think any characterization of a generation is going to be a mischaracterization, because of differences in class, race, and location experiences.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see that many differences between your characterization of Gen-X hip hop and Brabazon&#8217;s characterization. When she says Gen X literacy is about revelation, she is arguing that revelation is the &#8220;building of critical consciousness&#8221; (71), something that I think hip hop did quite well. I think, and I might be mischaracterizering Brabazon&#8217;s work here, that she&#8217;s also making a distinction between popular culture and more collective, local culture and memory work engaged by those on marginalized by society—the latter of which I&#8217;d characterize earlier hip hop as.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://michaeljfaris.com/blog/2009/07/revelation-without-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-21080</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 05:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaeljfaris.com/blog/?p=1397#comment-21080</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a little skeptical of this characterization of Gen X culture.  Sure, grunge and the slacker are  part of the experience--for a lot of white kids, in particular.  Hip hop (not just rap, but break dancing and urban street art) also came out during the years of Gen X and it changed American culture all across the country and now the world.  It became commercialized like a lot of other things in the United States, but initially it had some very deep criticisms and insights into urban life in America.  Like Chuck D said at the time, rap is the CNN of black America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little skeptical of this characterization of Gen X culture.  Sure, grunge and the slacker are  part of the experience&#8211;for a lot of white kids, in particular.  Hip hop (not just rap, but break dancing and urban street art) also came out during the years of Gen X and it changed American culture all across the country and now the world.  It became commercialized like a lot of other things in the United States, but initially it had some very deep criticisms and insights into urban life in America.  Like Chuck D said at the time, rap is the CNN of black America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://michaeljfaris.com/blog/2009/07/revelation-without-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-21026</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaeljfaris.com/blog/?p=1397#comment-21026</guid>
		<description>I am starting to feel the same, Nels. I&#039;m never sure whether to call myself Gen X or Gen Y (though the distinctions are clearly arbitrary and not simply descriptive; Brabazon writes, for example, &quot;Generation X does not have a past: they were invented by Douglas Coupland in 1992&quot; [p. 19]). Born in 1980, some call me Gen X, some Gen Y, and I used to always reject the Gen X label (because of the slacker label, I think), but now I&#039;m starting to feel it fits. Especially since I don&#039;t identify as much with 19-year-old college students who never watched Beevis and Butthead when it originally aired (as an example).

This book is great, by the way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am starting to feel the same, Nels. I&#8217;m never sure whether to call myself Gen X or Gen Y (though the distinctions are clearly arbitrary and not simply descriptive; Brabazon writes, for example, &#8220;Generation X does not have a past: they were invented by Douglas Coupland in 1992&#8243; [p. 19]). Born in 1980, some call me Gen X, some Gen Y, and I used to always reject the Gen X label (because of the slacker label, I think), but now I&#8217;m starting to feel it fits. Especially since I don&#8217;t identify as much with 19-year-old college students who never watched Beevis and Butthead when it originally aired (as an example).</p>
<p>This book is great, by the way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nels</title>
		<link>http://michaeljfaris.com/blog/2009/07/revelation-without-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-21024</link>
		<dc:creator>Nels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaeljfaris.com/blog/?p=1397#comment-21024</guid>
		<description>You know, I&#039;ve always liked being a part of Gen X.  When the phrases was really gaining ground in college, a lot of people were throwing fits about being labeled, but there were some descriptions of it that just made a lot of sense to me, like this one.  It&#039;s kinda nice not being a Baby Boomer or a member of Gen Y.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I&#8217;ve always liked being a part of Gen X.  When the phrases was really gaining ground in college, a lot of people were throwing fits about being labeled, but there were some descriptions of it that just made a lot of sense to me, like this one.  It&#8217;s kinda nice not being a Baby Boomer or a member of Gen Y.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

