<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;we&#8217;re wrong, and Glenn Beck proves it&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaeljfaris.com/blog/2009/06/were-wrong-and-glenn-beck-proves-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaeljfaris.com/blog/2009/06/were-wrong-and-glenn-beck-proves-it/</link>
	<description>rhetorics, compositions, technologies, literacies, sexualities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:05:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://michaeljfaris.com/blog/2009/06/were-wrong-and-glenn-beck-proves-it/comment-page-1/#comment-20306</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaeljfaris.com/blog/?p=1371#comment-20306</guid>
		<description>First Eric: I&#039;ve seen discussions of flaming on comments on discussion boards in a classroom setting — who read what as flaming and why. But I don&#039;t recall specifically a study of blog comments.

Second Eric: Yes, the troll doesn&#039;t appear to realize that &lt;i&gt;my&lt;/i&gt; point was that Beck is actually a great rhetorician (though I&#039;d add unethical). I fail to see how my single point is &quot;convoluted&quot; or full of &quot;meaningless words.&quot; 

Though I don&#039;t really see the quoted material as meaningless or convoluted either.

Pardon me, I have to go. I think one of my left-wing socialist teachers is calling. — oh, wait, my mistake. I re-read his comment. The entire &quot;left wing socialism thinking school system&quot; is calling!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First Eric: I&#8217;ve seen discussions of flaming on comments on discussion boards in a classroom setting — who read what as flaming and why. But I don&#8217;t recall specifically a study of blog comments.</p>
<p>Second Eric: Yes, the troll doesn&#8217;t appear to realize that <i>my</i> point was that Beck is actually a great rhetorician (though I&#8217;d add unethical). I fail to see how my single point is &#8220;convoluted&#8221; or full of &#8220;meaningless words.&#8221; </p>
<p>Though I don&#8217;t really see the quoted material as meaningless or convoluted either.</p>
<p>Pardon me, I have to go. I think one of my left-wing socialist teachers is calling. — oh, wait, my mistake. I re-read his comment. The entire &#8220;left wing socialism thinking school system&#8221; is calling!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Stoller</title>
		<link>http://michaeljfaris.com/blog/2009/06/were-wrong-and-glenn-beck-proves-it/comment-page-1/#comment-20305</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Stoller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaeljfaris.com/blog/?p=1371#comment-20305</guid>
		<description>Like most &quot;trolls&quot;, Why required, has not bothered to note that you were quoting someone&#039;s post and that you didn&#039;t actually &quot;use&quot; the phrase &quot;right fringe.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like most &#8220;trolls&#8221;, Why required, has not bothered to note that you were quoting someone&#8217;s post and that you didn&#8217;t actually &#8220;use&#8221; the phrase &#8220;right fringe.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://michaeljfaris.com/blog/2009/06/were-wrong-and-glenn-beck-proves-it/comment-page-1/#comment-20304</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 13:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaeljfaris.com/blog/?p=1371#comment-20304</guid>
		<description>Has anyone ever done a rhetorical analysis of blog comment threads?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone ever done a rhetorical analysis of blog comment threads?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why required</title>
		<link>http://michaeljfaris.com/blog/2009/06/were-wrong-and-glenn-beck-proves-it/comment-page-1/#comment-20267</link>
		<dc:creator>Why required</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaeljfaris.com/blog/?p=1371#comment-20267</guid>
		<description>Like most &#039;intellectuals&#039; you make everything sound academic in order to flaunt your perceived mental superiority. However, you do exactly what you accuse Beck of doing when you use terms like &#039;right-fringe&#039; to make your convoluted points. You are an example of a student of a left wing socialism thinking school system that is dangerous to America. You believe you are credible but your words are meaningless..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like most &#8216;intellectuals&#8217; you make everything sound academic in order to flaunt your perceived mental superiority. However, you do exactly what you accuse Beck of doing when you use terms like &#8216;right-fringe&#8217; to make your convoluted points. You are an example of a student of a left wing socialism thinking school system that is dangerous to America. You believe you are credible but your words are meaningless..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

