<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: notes on academic agonism from Mike Rose</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaeljfaris.com/blog/2007/09/notes-on-academic-agonism-from-mike-rose/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaeljfaris.com/blog/2007/09/notes-on-academic-agonism-from-mike-rose/</link>
	<description>rhetorics, compositions, technologies, literacies, sexualities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:05:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans Ostrom</title>
		<link>http://michaeljfaris.com/blog/2007/09/notes-on-academic-agonism-from-mike-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-17713</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Ostrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregonstate.edu/~farism/blog/?p=469#comment-17713</guid>
		<description>Bohm, David. _On Dialogue_. 2004. London: Routledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bohm, David. _On Dialogue_. 2004. London: Routledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://michaeljfaris.com/blog/2007/09/notes-on-academic-agonism-from-mike-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregonstate.edu/~farism/blog/?p=469#comment-351</guid>
		<description>Yes. I read part (maybe even most) of it about a year and a half ago. It really made me think â€” and was probably one of the reasons I became more interested in public debates and agonism and irenicism in discourse.

Thanks for reminding me, though. I&#039;d probably return to it if I wasn&#039;t so busy right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. I read part (maybe even most) of it about a year and a half ago. It really made me think â€” and was probably one of the reasons I became more interested in public debates and agonism and irenicism in discourse.</p>
<p>Thanks for reminding me, though. I&#8217;d probably return to it if I wasn&#8217;t so busy right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://michaeljfaris.com/blog/2007/09/notes-on-academic-agonism-from-mike-rose/comment-page-1/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 16:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oregonstate.edu/~farism/blog/?p=469#comment-350</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re interested, Walter Ong&#039;s book &lt;em&gt;Fighting For Life&lt;/em&gt; is all about the agonistic nature of Western intellectual life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re interested, Walter Ong&#8217;s book <em>Fighting For Life</em> is all about the agonistic nature of Western intellectual life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

